<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What almost everybody else doesn&#8217;t get about bisexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/</link>
	<description>Because &#039;kinky&#039; is an adjective, not an activity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N/A &#171; Whip Appeal ~Ramblings From A Whip~</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-293374</link>
		<dc:creator>N/A &#171; Whip Appeal ~Ramblings From A Whip~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-293374</guid>
		<description>[...] First, my blog speaking for me, I can and have been monogamous maybe not in the way other term it but I have. I have been married for over 10 year to the same man, and in a relationship for 8 years with a woman at the same time we lived together. I was monogamous what I believe monogamous. I had a single sexual partner one was a female the other a male. It worked for us, they were not interested in each other, but I was interested in them. We didn’t go outside of our relationship. Some might call that being greedy, or me not being able to make up my mind. Well, maybe for some 18 year olds that’s true. We were all about the same age, he was 20 and she was 19. Looking at it another way, maybe the fact that I and we were what some would say young we were making decisions that “adults” would find hard to nail down. We were free to or open to experiment. I call it knowing what I wanted and willing to work at having it. And it was work on all sides. If some are not willing to do the work; on what they want why knock some that are? Take the time to examine your own shit.  And since people are so into finding out how I take my sex, which I find stupid to focus on here an answer. On some profiles that ask for my sexual orientation I always list N/A, not that I think folks would know what box to put how I take my sex. Hence why I just say I enjoy the sexual experience with people but there’s no box for that. If saying I&#8217;m bi makes folks feel better the answer they really want me to give is more for them then me. Here&#8217;s something by maymay that I can get behind, yeah I&#8217;m one of those, (stalker)LOL What almost everybody else doesn&#8217;t get about bisexuality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, my blog speaking for me, I can and have been monogamous maybe not in the way other term it but I have. I have been married for over 10 year to the same man, and in a relationship for 8 years with a woman at the same time we lived together. I was monogamous what I believe monogamous. I had a single sexual partner one was a female the other a male. It worked for us, they were not interested in each other, but I was interested in them. We didn’t go outside of our relationship. Some might call that being greedy, or me not being able to make up my mind. Well, maybe for some 18 year olds that’s true. We were all about the same age, he was 20 and she was 19. Looking at it another way, maybe the fact that I and we were what some would say young we were making decisions that “adults” would find hard to nail down. We were free to or open to experiment. I call it knowing what I wanted and willing to work at having it. And it was work on all sides. If some are not willing to do the work; on what they want why knock some that are? Take the time to examine your own shit.  And since people are so into finding out how I take my sex, which I find stupid to focus on here an answer. On some profiles that ask for my sexual orientation I always list N/A, not that I think folks would know what box to put how I take my sex. Hence why I just say I enjoy the sexual experience with people but there’s no box for that. If saying I&#8217;m bi makes folks feel better the answer they really want me to give is more for them then me. Here&#8217;s something by maymay that I can get behind, yeah I&#8217;m one of those, (stalker)LOL What almost everybody else doesn&#8217;t get about bisexuality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-129006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-129006</guid>
		<description>I like that idea of bisexuality as the space between the points. It&#039;s definitely not the popular conception, but it&#039;s certainly a more useful one. Falls in nice with the Kinsey scale, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that idea of bisexuality as the space between the points. It&#8217;s definitely not the popular conception, but it&#8217;s certainly a more useful one. Falls in nice with the Kinsey scale, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honor thy language: “kinky” is an adjective, not an activity &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-121964</link>
		<dc:creator>Honor thy language: “kinky” is an adjective, not an activity &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-121964</guid>
		<description>[...] Since I was a boy, I have been confronted with the maddening reality of being told to second-guess myself, that due to who I am (a person diagnosed with bipolar disorder) I can&#8217;t trust my own thoughts or feelings. Then I grew up and I learned that certain words do not mean to others what they mean to me. This has made me rather persnickety with regards to the lexicon of sexual speech. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since I was a boy, I have been confronted with the maddening reality of being told to second-guess myself, that due to who I am (a person diagnosed with bipolar disorder) I can&#8217;t trust my own thoughts or feelings. Then I grew up and I learned that certain words do not mean to others what they mean to me. This has made me rather persnickety with regards to the lexicon of sexual speech. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NomSecret</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>NomSecret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the contrary, every creative writer who wants people to relate to their writing tends to use the most subjective form of communication possible, not the most objective.&quot;

That&#039;s what I was trying to say.  I think my meaning may have gotten lost in the rewrite I had to do when my computer burped on me.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the contrary, every creative writer who wants people to relate to their writing tends to use the most subjective form of communication possible, not the most objective.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I was trying to say.  I think my meaning may have gotten lost in the rewrite I had to do when my computer burped on me.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Removing it, or asking them to remove theirs in order to talk to you, is asking an impossible thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve never asked people to do that. Instead, I&#039;m acknowledging the fact that people &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; do that, and, to put it simply, &lt;a href=&quot;/2007/07/31/the-case-against-supremacy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they can&#039;t&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And at the same time, my understanding of what that word means is rounded out, has more meaning added (not less!). And the more meaning I have, the less assumption I make about what the next person who uses that word means.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can understand this point of view, but I have to politely disagree completely. You&#039;re not adding new meaning to a single word, you&#039;re creating a lookup table of one &quot;meaning&quot; indexed by the person you&#039;re being spoken to. The fact that you are also gaining an awareness that a single word can have multiple meanings actually puts your practice more in line with my theory.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it’s similar to an age-old creative writing problem: the writer decides he needs to write a great book that everybody will understand and relate to, so he tries writing about something that everyone has experienced, and using words in a way that is as un-subjective as possible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the contrary, every creative writer who wants people to relate to their writing tends to use the &lt;em&gt;most&lt;/em&gt; subjective form of communication possible, not the most objective. That&#039;s the job of technical writers, like myself. It&#039;s just that the bad creative writers don&#039;t know this and are thus, as you say, not very interesting.

Sorry this is terse, but I am stressed for time at the moment. Thanks for the lovely comment, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Removing it, or asking them to remove theirs in order to talk to you, is asking an impossible thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve never asked people to do that. Instead, I&#8217;m acknowledging the fact that people <em>don&#8217;t</em> do that, and, to put it simply, <a href="/2007/07/31/the-case-against-supremacy/" rel="nofollow">they can&#8217;t</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>And at the same time, my understanding of what that word means is rounded out, has more meaning added (not less!). And the more meaning I have, the less assumption I make about what the next person who uses that word means.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can understand this point of view, but I have to politely disagree completely. You&#8217;re not adding new meaning to a single word, you&#8217;re creating a lookup table of one &#8220;meaning&#8221; indexed by the person you&#8217;re being spoken to. The fact that you are also gaining an awareness that a single word can have multiple meanings actually puts your practice more in line with my theory.</p>
<blockquote><p>I think it’s similar to an age-old creative writing problem: the writer decides he needs to write a great book that everybody will understand and relate to, so he tries writing about something that everyone has experienced, and using words in a way that is as un-subjective as possible.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the contrary, every creative writer who wants people to relate to their writing tends to use the <em>most</em> subjective form of communication possible, not the most objective. That&#8217;s the job of technical writers, like myself. It&#8217;s just that the bad creative writers don&#8217;t know this and are thus, as you say, not very interesting.</p>
<p>Sorry this is terse, but I am stressed for time at the moment. Thanks for the lovely comment, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NomSecret</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>NomSecret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Hi, and sorry for posting a comment so late.  I can&#039;t resist:

I&#039;m fascinated by this idea and, while I think what you&#039;re trying to do is great, I question your ability to do it by attempting to remove added meaning from words.  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s such a thing as a word without added meaning.  Any word comes with meaning.  And the meaning comes from other times the person has heard that word (including, but not limited to, reading it in the dictionary -- and there&#039;s the issue of which dictionary we&#039;re using, of course.  There are lots, and the relative number of words you use and have looked up is tiny).  Removing it, or asking them to remove theirs in order to talk to you, is asking an impossible thing.

What I learned from the comments on this post is that, when each person explains what they mean by the word they use for their sexuality, then I understand what they mean, and not before.  And at the same time, my understanding of what that word means is rounded out, has more meaning added (not less!).  And the more meaning I have, the less assumption I make about what the next person who uses that word means.

I think it&#039;s similar to an age-old creative writing problem:  the writer decides he needs to write a great book that everybody will understand and relate to, so he tries writing about something that everyone has experienced, and using words in a way that is as un-subjective as possible.  (&quot;The person walked the dog on the roadway.&quot;)  And it&#039;s awful (from an enjoyment point of view).  And also he gives nothing that we can relate to except the words he uses.  So people with ferrets or who walk in fields look at it and say, &quot;there&#039;s nothing there that I relate to.&quot;  If he instead goes as subjective as possible, tells us that Tim-Bit the recalcitrant corgy tugs the leash just as Norman steps off the curb and he steps in a puddle that&#039;s rainbow-sheened with oil and thinks &quot;well, sod a dog, that&#039;s going to stain my new Reebox&quot;), then a) it&#039;s more likely people will keep reading, and thus he can get his message across, and b) he gets the message across more accurately than if he&#039;d used only what everyone has experienced (no added meaning).

God, sorry this is so long.  That&#039;s the problem with my theory:  it takes longer to be subjective.  But it works, which I feel is a plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, and sorry for posting a comment so late.  I can&#8217;t resist:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fascinated by this idea and, while I think what you&#8217;re trying to do is great, I question your ability to do it by attempting to remove added meaning from words.  I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s such a thing as a word without added meaning.  Any word comes with meaning.  And the meaning comes from other times the person has heard that word (including, but not limited to, reading it in the dictionary &#8212; and there&#8217;s the issue of which dictionary we&#8217;re using, of course.  There are lots, and the relative number of words you use and have looked up is tiny).  Removing it, or asking them to remove theirs in order to talk to you, is asking an impossible thing.</p>
<p>What I learned from the comments on this post is that, when each person explains what they mean by the word they use for their sexuality, then I understand what they mean, and not before.  And at the same time, my understanding of what that word means is rounded out, has more meaning added (not less!).  And the more meaning I have, the less assumption I make about what the next person who uses that word means.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s similar to an age-old creative writing problem:  the writer decides he needs to write a great book that everybody will understand and relate to, so he tries writing about something that everyone has experienced, and using words in a way that is as un-subjective as possible.  (&#8220;The person walked the dog on the roadway.&#8221;)  And it&#8217;s awful (from an enjoyment point of view).  And also he gives nothing that we can relate to except the words he uses.  So people with ferrets or who walk in fields look at it and say, &#8220;there&#8217;s nothing there that I relate to.&#8221;  If he instead goes as subjective as possible, tells us that Tim-Bit the recalcitrant corgy tugs the leash just as Norman steps off the curb and he steps in a puddle that&#8217;s rainbow-sheened with oil and thinks &#8220;well, sod a dog, that&#8217;s going to stain my new Reebox&#8221;), then a) it&#8217;s more likely people will keep reading, and thus he can get his message across, and b) he gets the message across more accurately than if he&#8217;d used only what everyone has experienced (no added meaning).</p>
<p>God, sorry this is so long.  That&#8217;s the problem with my theory:  it takes longer to be subjective.  But it works, which I feel is a plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Marcus: &quot;&lt;em&gt;blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;oh my, maymay, you&#039;ve got an awful lot of words coming out of your mouth.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oh my, Marcus, you don&#039;t seem to have a lot of words coming out of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus: &#8220;<em>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.</p>
<p>oh my, maymay, you&#8217;ve got an awful lot of words coming out of your mouth.</em>&#8220;</p>
<p>Oh my, Marcus, you don&#8217;t seem to have a lot of words coming out of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;oh my, maymay, you&#039;ve got an awful lot of words coming out of your mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.</p>
<p>oh my, maymay, you&#8217;ve got an awful lot of words coming out of your mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devastatingyet</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>devastatingyet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I feel like &quot;bisexual&quot; is a bit limiting because if there were some other gender (not an in-between one, but an actual other one, like aliens) I think I would like them too.  &quot;Bisexual&quot; is also a bit strong for me because I&#039;m really more hetero than not, alas.  I need some word that means, like, &quot;mostly hetero but will sleep with anything that can give a good conversation first.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like &#8220;bisexual&#8221; is a bit limiting because if there were some other gender (not an in-between one, but an actual other one, like aliens) I think I would like them too.  &#8220;Bisexual&#8221; is also a bit strong for me because I&#8217;m really more hetero than not, alas.  I need some word that means, like, &#8220;mostly hetero but will sleep with anything that can give a good conversation first.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/2007/08/30/what-almost-everybody-else-doesnt-get-about-bisexuality/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&#039;m sorry my answer embodies a binary thinginess of gender.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bitchy, I f&#039;ing love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I&#8217;m sorry my answer embodies a binary thinginess of gender.</em></p>
<p>Bitchy, I f&#8217;ing love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

