I don’t like Halloween. I never did. Halloween is the quintessential children’s holiday. It’s entirely about rewards with no consequences. When you’re a child, that means it’s about the candy. When you’re an adult, that means it’s about whatever the rest of your life can’t be about.
For sexually repressed adults (i.e., most adults), that means Halloween is about sex.
It’s an old joke in kink circles: Halloween is the vanilla person’s excuse to be kinky. Of course, a vanilla person’s definition of “being kinky” is something that people like me (who consider their intrinsic sexuality to be composed of what other people often consider taboo) think is very tame indeed.
A case in point is the traditional slutty costumes popular during Halloween. Sluts, gasp, are actually perceived as kinky to most people. That, in itself, could be an entire post. How incredibly right-wing puritanical it is that the display of sexuality itself is a taboo. Sex is a sin; birth is only possible through sex; therefore everyone is inescapably a sinner.
With the ridiculousness of the “Holy Virgin” syllogisms aside, Halloween is the one American holiday where Catholicism and anti-sex propaganda isn’t shoved down the throats of the largely blind and ignorant masses of people who “celebrate” the “holiday.” So, they do during Halloween what they can’t do elsewhere in the year.
Halloween is an opportunity to masquerade oneself as something you are understood not to actually be. It is an exemption from the hum-drum rules of daily living that bind you to the consequences of your actions. And people take advantage of this freedom in all sorts of interesting ways.
But why do people masquerade themselves like this in the first place? Most simply, they do this during Halloween as a means to experiment with attitudes, ideas, and expressions that they are either unfamiliar or uncomfortable with because during Halloween, everyone knows, there are no committments. All of this “acting out” is an effort to discover attitudes, ideas, and expressions that they are comfortable with.
Halloween is one giant societal bullshit session. It’s the religious and societal equivalent of a “Get Out Of Hell Free” card. How else would self-respecting religious boys and girls ever feel comfortable dressing up as such blasphemous things like ghosts and skeletons, or worse, like religious symbols such as members of the clergy, or even a crucified Jesus himself? This “Get Out Of Hell Free” card gives Jane the “Good Girl Next Door” the guilt-free opportunity to be a sexy nurse, or Catwoman (the superhero stereotype of the sexually dominant woman, a dominatrix one might dare say, which is unsurprisingly much rarer than the “sexy nurse” costumes). Likewise, it gives John the “Man’s Man Frat Boy” a chance to dress in drag.
Now of course, it is not necessarily the case that Good Girl Jane or Man’s Man John care all too deeply about actually being the thing they are pretending to be, a “sexy nurse” or simply a “girl” in these examples. But the fact remains that an absolutely overwhelming majority of girls who dress up for halloween turn themselves into the classic example of a sex object. Similarly, the overwhelming majority of boys who dress up for halloween turn themselves into comedic, if not actually accurate, representations of the opposite gender.
I get the question, “What are you going to be for Halloween?” just like everyone else does. I look around at the way other people live their lives and I see the need, the aching, screaming necessity most people have for just this kind of event in their lives.
“Me?” I ask. “I don’t like Halloween.” It’s far too sad a holiday, if you think about it; it’s the inevitable day every year when I see hundreds of thousands of people wanting and not having, and (worse) not even thinking twice about it.
Okay, after getting a bunch of comments on this post, it seems that either A) no one’s observant enough to comprehend my overarching point in this entry or, and this is the more likely explanation, B) this post’s brevity or terseness has caused people to latch on to ideas I didn’t intend as the main point. So, setting the record straight:
- I do not believe Halloween is a “bad” holiday, that it should not exist, that it does no good, or that it can not entail a great deal of fun.
- I do not believe that everyone who participates in the celebration is shallow, repressed, or otherwise unhealthy.
If you take the time to read this post without introducing your own stories and take me at face value and nothing more, which you should pretty much always do, you’ll see I never once made such claims, even though quite a few people have implied that I have. Fuck, I like looking at all the T&A just as much as you do, and even though I don’t personally enjoy dressing up to go trick-or-treating, I’ve gone to my share of Halloween costume parties and I’ve had a ball at most of them.
Instead, this post’s main intended thrust was a remark more akin to, “Yay, even repressed people get to have fun.” And yes, like it or not, a sadly gigantic number of people who enjoy this holiday are sexually repressed, confused, or otherwise have a characteristic that I will describe as unhealthy or unhappy. Furthermore, I don’t think anyone’s actually arguing with that point—we all know why you’re not.
Look, the bottom line is this: I don’t presume to tell you what to do in regards to you. In fact, I don’t believe I ever have, because doing so is a violation of the most serious kind—it breaks the rule of no imposition, a principle that simply states that the only thing I have a right to impose on others is how they should treat me. Yet this kind of violation happens every day, all the time, by people, by governments, by employers, and by culture and society, and we have become so used to it that we treat one another’s words as if such imposition was the intention even when it was not. That, my friends, is a tragedy.
Even though for many people it is not, for many others Halloween is just such a cultural example of that tragedy. That’s all I was trying to say in this entry.
See also Eileen’s Live and Let Die.
See also, Bruce Schneier’s The War on Different.
by Wendy
30 Oct 2007 at 01:23
Its things like that, that on some level make me dislike Halloween, or what Halloween has become. Lately, I tend to spend the evening by myself, in quiet meditation rather than attend parties.
Its the one pagan holiday, along with christmas, where the assimilation starts to bother me. However, unlike christmas, I can at least spend Samhain how I want to. (I have to make an appearance at family christmas’s, on pain of…pain. But now I’m old enough to drink, so its tolerable.)
There’s also the other annoyances of being a pagan on Halloween. I dislike that I become a novelty. During my first round of college, my friends convinced me to go to Salem (which is actually lots of fun, even if I didn’t get to go to the midnight ritual on gallows hill), and they tried to get me to be their ‘Pagan tour guide’. Because, you know, thats totally appropriate. If I had asked one of them to take me to Yom Kipour services and be my ‘Jewish tour guide’, they would have been terribly offended.
Though, on the upside, it *is* fun to see my sister buying her first slutty outfit. Soon, Josie will be just as trampy as Christine and I. :) Baby steps. Today, Halloween, tomorrow…Easter.
by maymay
30 Oct 2007 at 01:37
I feel that way about the kinkiness and the attitudes towards sex. Not that I’m overtly such an exhibitionist anyway, but there’s something distastefully cheap in the way most people approach “being kinky” on Halloween that leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.
In fact, it’s very similar to the attitudes I face during the Heritage of Pride parade. There, the attitude is one of disbelief (“You don’t really get whipped for fun, and those marks are actually lipstick, right?”), whereas on Halloween the attitude is one of insincerity (“I’m not really kinky, I’m just playing a kinky slut for the holidays.”). Neither of these positions are particularly enjoyable for me.
by Sue
30 Oct 2007 at 12:41
“I dislike that I become a novelty.” May, I feel the same way you do about this, and agree that Wendy’s comment applies easily to the idea of being “kinky” for Halloween. I hate the whole Ricky’s slutty-costume culture. They’re not only co-opting what I consider my culture, but they’re making fun of it. By playing at it for one night, maybe they’re living out their deeply hidden fantasies, but I think they’re also saying that this persona – the “dominatrix,” the “girl in latex,” the “slutty Dorothy” – can only be put on as a costume, and is only acceptable when it’s clear that it’s who you’re pretending to be, not who you are.
If you haven’t read it yet, check out this week’s New York Magazine – Em & Lo wrote a column on this very issue. It doesn’t say anything more in depth than what you wrote here, but I liked the part where they discuss how all of these costumes – sexy nurse, sexy devil, sexy janitor – are basically the same costume: slut.
The funny thing is, if I were going to go to a bdsm Halloween play party and dress up (more on that in a moment), I would probably dress in a sexy/slutty costme. Because that’s what’s appropriate. That’s how I dress anytime I go to an SM party or event. For me, the joke is bringing my SM self into the costume, not the costume itself.
However, I hate dressing up. Always have, even as a kid. Dropped the whole thing as soon as I could (or started wearing my red-hooded sweatshirt and saying I was Little Red Riding Hood.) Perhaps it’s the same reason I could never find or want a scene name. I’m Sue. At work or at Paddles, I’m Sue. The clothing may change, but it’s still me. So when I put on a hardly-there dress, fishnets and high heels, that’s not a costume I’m wearing. It’s just another aspect of me.
by Patty
30 Oct 2007 at 12:45
Wendy,
Here in the Bible Belt the pagan community is in an uproar. Trick-or-treating was moved from Wednesday to Tuesday so as not to conflict with Wednesday church night. So it is fine to move a sacred day, but not religious classe?
maymay,
I never thought of Halloween like that, but you are completely right. While I love the idea of stepping out of yourself for a day, why is it normally inherently sexy? I can remember one sexy costume that I borrowed due to not having anything else. Perhaps that is one way to determine who are comfortable with their sexuality; it is not a costume, just a part of them every day.
by maymay
30 Oct 2007 at 13:47
Damn. Would you sign my petition for moving Christmas to Friday this year? You see, I get the whole work week before Christmas off, and right now Christmas falls on a Tuesday.
by Wendy
30 Oct 2007 at 15:30
I think its frustrating that whenever something one intrinsically *is*, something that you consider a part of who you are, is mocked, becomes a novelty, its frustrating.
Halloween is a great example of this for both kink, and paganism. Something I *am*, all the time, is a novelty for someone else., and they take it, use it, and make their own, and then take if off like its something that one *can* take off. “Look at me, I’m so deviant, I’m a sexy witch! Oooh, so bad, until tomorrow!”
Another example that gets to me are straight girls who make out with each other to get male attention. Thanks girls. Now my sexual orientation is a novelty, and boys vanilla boys think I’m making out with girls to put on a show for them.
As for moving trick or treating…blarg. I shake my head at that!
by maymay
30 Oct 2007 at 16:06
I don’t have any problem with someone trying my way of the world on for size, as long they don’t call it “not good enough” or similar when they decide it’s not for them. There’s no harm in the trying, only in the value judgements.
Ooh. You’re peeking at my draft posts. (Is that like blogger upskirt shots? (Notice the gendered reference, thank you, thank you. (Yes, that was a meta-comment.))) Though for now I basically have the same comment as before: I don’t have any problem with someone engaging in homosexual sexual activity for the purpose of attracting a heterosexual partner (I’ll happily do it), as long as they don’t delude themselves or anyone else about what they’re doing. There’s no harm in the sex, only in the imposition of one person’s sexuality onto another.
by Wendy
30 Oct 2007 at 17:47
Hm. I think I’d enjoy peeking up your hypothetical skirt. :-P
But I think its one thing to try a new lifestyle and see if its for you. How else are people going to figure out what they like?
But I think I’m trying to agree with you in a very round about confusing way.
by Tom Alien
30 Oct 2007 at 21:45
It’s the religious and societal equivalent of a “Get Out Of Hell Free†card.
Geez, May, ever hear of “Mardi Gras?” Some cultures recognize the need for adults to let off some steam once in a while.
I’m with you on the “kinky” thing, though. I once dated a girl who kept insisting to me that she was kinky. She was rather shocked one evening to learn exactly how wide a definition gap we had. To her, kinky was “liking sex often” (fsv of “often” – apparently more than once a week) and something about oral sex. This was supposed to impress me. When she realized that I didn’t wear underwear, owned some serious restraints, and knew more than 3 positions for intercourse, she decided that I had passed kinky and gone right over into “perverted.”
*sighs*
But I think that a group of people at least pretending one night a year to step outside their comfort zone is still a good thing overall. It’s possible that some of those people *need* Shalloween in order to give rein to some very repressed desires that they might not have any other outlet. Or, as Wendy says, how else would they get an opportunity to test and experiment?
by maymay
30 Oct 2007 at 22:53
You’ll find no argument with that here, Tom. All’s I’m saying is that a world in which most people have one night a year to pretend they can step outside of their comfot zones is a sorry place if I ever saw one—and it should go without sayin’ that I’ve seen a lot of sorry sorts of places.
The more important message is, of course, it can be better. Really.
by Sue
31 Oct 2007 at 10:52
You know, Jason and I talked about this issue a bit this morning on the subway and I think I ws being too harsh yesterday. Yes, I wish people wouldn’t repress their desires to such a level that they only let them come out once a year. But in that case, I have to say that while I pity those people, let them have their fun. As Jason says, lots of people like to put on another persona now and then, or roleplay. It’s fun, and it doesn’t hurt anyone. If Halloween is the time that they choose to do this, what do I care? It lets people try something that they’re curious about under a layer of “permission.” (As I said to Jason, why do they need permission? I go out all year long in whatever I like without needing permission from anyone… well, except J. :) But meaning, I don’t need a national holiday to “permit” me to dress slutty and live out my fantasies. But… some people do.)
Pingback
by Lip/Suck « The Edge of Vanilla
31 Oct 2007 at 16:19
[…] Allen Over on Maybemaimed, my friend maymay is ranting about the shallowness of some people who use Halloween as a mini-Mardi […]
by Dee
31 Oct 2007 at 17:02
As a person from New Orleans and a great lover of both Mardi Gras and Halloween….I welcome all the “repressed individuals” who just happen to run live their lives as they sexually please, without caring about the comparison of people who over generalize, to join me. I love Mardi Gras and Halloween. Both are sexy…both encourage people to live as they want without condemnation…even if it is only for one small day. For some, one day is needed and I encourage them to take it! I would think that the promotin of self awareness…in whatever form it takes…would be encouraged by all.~~Dee
by maymay
31 Oct 2007 at 19:19
Did nobody read this following part of my post?
Pingback
by Scientific Mad Love » Blog Archive » What I dressed as, When
31 Oct 2007 at 23:32
[…] I’ve read a bunch of posts bemoaning the state of the world that people dress slutty and call it kink, then peel and […]
by Susan
31 Oct 2007 at 23:49
How do you know these people are repressed simply because they put on a costume? Seems to me you’re the one making the value judgments.
by maymay
01 Nov 2007 at 00:42
See my update to the post above.
by Patty
01 Nov 2007 at 05:19
Damn. Would you sign my petition for moving Christmas to Friday this year? You see, I get the whole work week before Christmas off, and right now Christmas falls on a Tuesday
I would be happy to! While we are at it, let’s move all holidays to Fridays. ;)
by SJ
01 Nov 2007 at 20:30
I think that even in the most isolated monocultures, you have differences in tastes, preferences, opinions. In more cosmopolitan areas, we encounter wider divergence from our values, preferences, ethics and tastes. Some people encounter this and broaden their standards of what’s acceptable to them. Others encounter this and shut down, becoming very defensive of their values. Some attempt to impose their values to return order to their perception of the world.
I think that we all live in a larger culture with which we don’t entirely agree. To varying degrees we don’t consent to the rules that culture places upon us – and we also don’t always consent to the lack of rules where we want them. A less restrictive primary culture allows for areas of sub-cultures with stronger or more numerous rules, which is part of why pluralist societies can hold together with less force than enforced monocultures of similar population.
Still, I think people would be most comfortable to live in cultures in which they agreed with and identified with all the rules and assumptions and values – especially including that everything they thought should have rules did have them, as much as things they thought shouldn’t have rules not having them. A comfortable world where things worked as they expected. Not challenging or forcing them to grow – not allowing them to change, even. A soft cotton cage for the spirit.
by Kristy (ScientificMadLove)
01 Nov 2007 at 21:31
I’m sorry for putting words in your mouth. I don’t know you or your tone. Perhaps everyone will enjoy a coming post, “All generalizations are bad.” : ) Two isn’t really a bunch. And not everyone has to like my favorite holiday. Oversensitive much? O.K. I think most (some) of the crow is down and I can hide the rest under the garnish.
Pingback
by HNT - Hair Naked Thursday « The Edge of Vanilla
01 Nov 2007 at 22:24
[…] I don’t dress up for Halloween, but I sometimes put on a bit of costume when I hand out the swag. Just to amuse the kiddies, mind you, and not because I’m an uptight, sexually repressed wanna-be. […]
by Daremo
04 Dec 2007 at 23:58
Even though I love Halloween, and places like the Rocky Horror Picture Show, I understand your point. Halloween is a good excuse for some “normal” people to safely explore aspects of their own personality that are otherwise uncomfortable curiosities. And that’s probably very healthy for them (so they don’t explode)
We can’t dress certain ways in “polite society” without repercussions. For instance I’d lose my job (and possibly face a lynch mob) if too much or my private life were made public. It can be very upsetting to think about how limited our freedom really is.
As for being a novelty, people not in alternative lifestyles just don’t see it that way. My husband complains every year about the teens who dress “goth” for Halloween and call themselves kinky. To some of those kids it’s just harmless fun. To others there is an underlying desire to explore their sexuality. It is a valid point. Some people just got a little sensitive about it :)
by maymay
05 Dec 2007 at 14:55
My brother has recently gotten his first piercings: two ear-cuffs and an eyebrow ring. My mother, the traditionalist in our family, is happy with all of this except the eyebrow ring. When questioned about why that piercing in particular upset her so much, her only response was along the lines of “it’s not generally accepted.”
Indeed, my brother may potentially be required to remove his eyebrow ring during working hours at some of the jobs he might want to take, so “not generally accepted” is a perfectly truthful thing to say. Yet, it strikes me as nothing less than insane to equate the performance of jobs with something like an eyebrow ring and not be able to see the correlation between cultural judgments and freedom while you do it.
Pingback
by Suddenly the world seems such a perfect place: Technomaddery, Cyberbusking, and More « Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed
02 Jan 2012 at 03:55
[…] or arbitrary markers like a “new year†are difficult times for me. Either they seem an excuse for thoughtless hedonism—parties without purpose, drinks without delight, gifts without generosity, kisses without […]