<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeing Sexuality Information at KinkForAll Boston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/</link>
	<description>Because &#039;kinky&#039; is an adjective, not an activity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Good boy,&#8221; and other kinds of complicated sex &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-131126</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Good boy,&#8221; and other kinds of complicated sex &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-131126</guid>
		<description>[...] the meaning of the word &#8220;pretty&#8221;: pretty song, pretty room, pretty girl. These are (sexist) sexual standards. They hurt me—and many others, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the meaning of the word &#8220;pretty&#8221;: pretty song, pretty room, pretty girl. These are (sexist) sexual standards. They hurt me—and many others, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; Free and Open to the Public Panel at Brown University: When Educators Are Censors (May 4th)</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-35375</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; Free and Open to the Public Panel at Brown University: When Educators Are Censors (May 4th)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-35375</guid>
		<description>[...] That Q&amp;A session, in particular, is why I think it&#8217;s so important that if you can attend, you do attend. And regardless of whether you can be there or not, please tell everyone you know in New England about this event, and cross-post the event details to any and all appropriate places. Everyone deserves the right to participate in public discourse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That Q&amp;A session, in particular, is why I think it&#8217;s so important that if you can attend, you do attend. And regardless of whether you can be there or not, please tell everyone you know in New England about this event, and cross-post the event details to any and all appropriate places. Everyone deserves the right to participate in public discourse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; On Youth, Sexuality, Education, and Your Fears</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-22986</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; On Youth, Sexuality, Education, and Your Fears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-22986</guid>
		<description>[...] the UN&#8217;s Universal Declaration of Human Rights implies, I believe that safe and free access to accurate, non-judgmental information about human sexuality and sexual freedom—or about anything of public interest, for that matter—is a fundamental human [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the UN&#8217;s Universal Declaration of Human Rights implies, I believe that safe and free access to accurate, non-judgmental information about human sexuality and sexual freedom—or about anything of public interest, for that matter—is a fundamental human [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acaptivatedman</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-21469</link>
		<dc:creator>acaptivatedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-21469</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think it is a profoundly “bad thing”. I don’t know how much you know about the situation in the UK but over the last 10 years there have been attacks on civil liberties and personal privacy that terrify me. This isn’t the place to rant about it but here are a couple of links that might be of interest:

http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/ 

http://www.no2id.net/

I do consider the particular law regarding the possession of so-called, violent images to be “monstrous”. We already have laws that cover non-consensual violence/imprisonment. This particular law will effectively criminalise people who possess images of perfectly legal activities. I should perhaps note that this particular stupid law won’t have any affect on me as my kink is very “Edge of Vanilla” (rubbish pun intended).

Thanks for the various links – I’ll go take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think it is a profoundly “bad thing”. I don’t know how much you know about the situation in the UK but over the last 10 years there have been attacks on civil liberties and personal privacy that terrify me. This isn’t the place to rant about it but here are a couple of links that might be of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.no2id.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.no2id.net/</a></p>
<p>I do consider the particular law regarding the possession of so-called, violent images to be “monstrous”. We already have laws that cover non-consensual violence/imprisonment. This particular law will effectively criminalise people who possess images of perfectly legal activities. I should perhaps note that this particular stupid law won’t have any affect on me as my kink is very “Edge of Vanilla” (rubbish pun intended).</p>
<p>Thanks for the various links – I’ll go take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-21395</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-21395</guid>
		<description>Wow, &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-21326&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acaptivatedman&lt;/a&gt;, that&#039;s really good information. Thanks for the heads up! As I&#039;m an American, I don&#039;t have any personal experience with England&#039;s laws, and it&#039;s surprisingly hard to keep up to date with foreign affairs since the mainstream American media is, as you may know, notoriously bad at providing level-headed and objective journalistic coverage of international goings-on.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#comment-21326&quot;&gt;I quite agree that open, honest and freely available sex information is a laudable aim. The problem, in the surveillance society that is now the UK, is that admitting to any kind of BDSM/CP orientated sexuality could result in serious, unwanted consequences.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huh, that makes a frightening kind of sense. Here&#039;s the thing, though—I don&#039;t think surveillance of the sort that England has is on its own a bad thing. What do you think? Is the &quot;surveillance society&quot; a negative thing on its own, or is it because &lt;em&gt;in conjunction with&lt;/em&gt; &quot;monstrous&quot; laws, it makes being &quot;out&quot; harder to do safely?

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#comment-21326&quot;&gt;Congratulations on the success of the KinkForAll unconference; do you fancy running one in the UK?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you!

I would &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; to see a KinkForAll unconference break out of America. However, I&#039;m in no financial or personal position to begin running one &lt;em&gt;myself&lt;/em&gt; in the UK. I was never even in a great position to run the upcoming one in Washington, DC. KinkForAll is a grassroots event—only the impetus of local people who work together and transparently with the larger community can put an event on. If you&#039;d like to see a KinKForAll event in the UK, the first steps to making that a reality is to &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/kinkforall&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;join the public, global mailing list&lt;/a&gt; and listen in on the conversations we&#039;re having, to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.kinkforall.org/FrequentlyAskedQuestions&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read through the various wiki pages&lt;/a&gt; we&#039;ve been composing over the last year or so, and generally involve yourself in the current community. At that point, you&#039;ll be much better equipped to stir up interest in having an event in the UK, and where there&#039;s more interest, there&#039;s more people willing and able to actually work with you to make it possible.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, <a href="#comment-21326" rel="nofollow">acaptivatedman</a>, that&#8217;s really good information. Thanks for the heads up! As I&#8217;m an American, I don&#8217;t have any personal experience with England&#8217;s laws, and it&#8217;s surprisingly hard to keep up to date with foreign affairs since the mainstream American media is, as you may know, notoriously bad at providing level-headed and objective journalistic coverage of international goings-on.</p>
<blockquote cite="#comment-21326"><p>I quite agree that open, honest and freely available sex information is a laudable aim. The problem, in the surveillance society that is now the UK, is that admitting to any kind of BDSM/CP orientated sexuality could result in serious, unwanted consequences.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh, that makes a frightening kind of sense. Here&#8217;s the thing, though—I don&#8217;t think surveillance of the sort that England has is on its own a bad thing. What do you think? Is the &#8220;surveillance society&#8221; a negative thing on its own, or is it because <em>in conjunction with</em> &#8220;monstrous&#8221; laws, it makes being &#8220;out&#8221; harder to do safely?</p>
<blockquote cite="#comment-21326"><p>Congratulations on the success of the KinkForAll unconference; do you fancy running one in the UK?</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>I would <em>love</em> to see a KinkForAll unconference break out of America. However, I&#8217;m in no financial or personal position to begin running one <em>myself</em> in the UK. I was never even in a great position to run the upcoming one in Washington, DC. KinkForAll is a grassroots event—only the impetus of local people who work together and transparently with the larger community can put an event on. If you&#8217;d like to see a KinKForAll event in the UK, the first steps to making that a reality is to <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/kinkforall" rel="nofollow">join the public, global mailing list</a> and listen in on the conversations we&#8217;re having, to <a href="http://wiki.kinkforall.org/FrequentlyAskedQuestions" rel="nofollow">read through the various wiki pages</a> we&#8217;ve been composing over the last year or so, and generally involve yourself in the current community. At that point, you&#8217;ll be much better equipped to stir up interest in having an event in the UK, and where there&#8217;s more interest, there&#8217;s more people willing and able to actually work with you to make it possible.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acaptivatedman</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-21326</link>
		<dc:creator>acaptivatedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-21326</guid>
		<description>Hi maymay,

I’ve just come across this post and enjoyed your presentation. You are probably aware that, in the UK, not only do we have the idiotic situation you touched on where a printer/distributor can effectively censor a publication; we also have a state-sponsored attack on “alternative” sexuality, most particularly the BDSM community.

The monstrous Criminal Justice and Immigration Act (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080004_en_9#pt5-pb1-l1g63), which became law in January of this year, makes it a criminal offence in England, Wales and Northern Ireland simply to possess material that is pornographic, depicts a level of serious violence or acts capable of doing harm, and is &#039;grossly offensive&#039;. It does not matter whether the material is real or staged: it needs only to be realistic.  Nor does it matter whether those participating in any acts depicted were consenting or not.  It will be criminal to possess. This means it has criminalised the possession of many adult fantasy images, including many lawful acts - you can do it legally, but you can&#039;t possess a realistic image of it.

As if that wasn’t enough, we also have the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 which puts in place a whole raft of measures to stop the “wrong” people working in sensitive (“regulated”) jobs. This includes just about anyone who has any contact with children as part of their job. You can be banned from these jobs if you possess “sexually explicit images depicting violence against human beings”. Time to choose - your job or your sexuality.

I quite agree that open, honest and freely available sex information is a laudable aim. The problem, in the surveillance society that is now the UK, is that admitting to any kind of BDSM/CP orientated sexuality could result in serious, unwanted consequences.

Congratulations on the success of the KinkForAll unconference; do you fancy running one in the UK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi maymay,</p>
<p>I’ve just come across this post and enjoyed your presentation. You are probably aware that, in the UK, not only do we have the idiotic situation you touched on where a printer/distributor can effectively censor a publication; we also have a state-sponsored attack on “alternative” sexuality, most particularly the BDSM community.</p>
<p>The monstrous Criminal Justice and Immigration Act (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080004_en_9#pt5-pb1-l1g63" rel="nofollow">http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080004_en_9#pt5-pb1-l1g63</a>), which became law in January of this year, makes it a criminal offence in England, Wales and Northern Ireland simply to possess material that is pornographic, depicts a level of serious violence or acts capable of doing harm, and is &#8216;grossly offensive&#8217;. It does not matter whether the material is real or staged: it needs only to be realistic.  Nor does it matter whether those participating in any acts depicted were consenting or not.  It will be criminal to possess. This means it has criminalised the possession of many adult fantasy images, including many lawful acts &#8211; you can do it legally, but you can&#8217;t possess a realistic image of it.</p>
<p>As if that wasn’t enough, we also have the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 which puts in place a whole raft of measures to stop the “wrong” people working in sensitive (“regulated”) jobs. This includes just about anyone who has any contact with children as part of their job. You can be banned from these jobs if you possess “sexually explicit images depicting violence against human beings”. Time to choose &#8211; your job or your sexuality.</p>
<p>I quite agree that open, honest and freely available sex information is a laudable aim. The problem, in the surveillance society that is now the UK, is that admitting to any kind of BDSM/CP orientated sexuality could result in serious, unwanted consequences.</p>
<p>Congratulations on the success of the KinkForAll unconference; do you fancy running one in the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KinkForAll (kinkforall) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:28:59 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-20426</link>
		<dc:creator>KinkForAll (kinkforall) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:28:59 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-20426</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/" rel="nofollow">http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/</a>        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meitar Moscovitz (maymaym) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:24:18 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-20423</link>
		<dc:creator>Meitar Moscovitz (maymaym) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:24:18 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-20423</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/" rel="nofollow">http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meitar Moscovitz (maymaym) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:21:16 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/#comment-20422</link>
		<dc:creator>Meitar Moscovitz (maymaym) 's status on Monday, 14-Sep-09 22:21:16 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=965#comment-20422</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/" rel="nofollow">http://maybemaimed.com/2009/09/14/freeing-sexuality-information/</a>        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

