<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Dichotomies that (No Longer) Jail Me – KinkForAll Providence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/</link>
	<description>Because &#039;kinky&#039; is an adjective, not an activity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Chrysalis: The End of the Mute Submissive Masculine &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-206777</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Chrysalis: The End of the Mute Submissive Masculine &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-206777</guid>
		<description>[...] I saw your KinkForAll Providence video,&#8221; he started, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been reading your blog. And I just wanted to say I really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I saw your KinkForAll Providence video,&#8221; he started, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been reading your blog. And I just wanted to say I really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SsexBbox: Gender is a text field &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-175081</link>
		<dc:creator>SsexBbox: Gender is a text field &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-175081</guid>
		<description>[...] of ourselves. To our technology, our genders are among our most baffling human properties. The binary coarseness with which our technology encodes this information should serve as a humbling reminder to anyone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of ourselves. To our technology, our genders are among our most baffling human properties. The binary coarseness with which our technology encodes this information should serve as a humbling reminder to anyone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Important Public Message &#171; Tales of a Domme (who doesn&#039;t take herself too seriously)</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-161357</link>
		<dc:creator>An Important Public Message &#171; Tales of a Domme (who doesn&#039;t take herself too seriously)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-161357</guid>
		<description>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming – duh duh duh – The Penetrator. This isn’t to say that there’s anything wrong with strapping on (I’m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can’t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that to ma... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming – duh duh duh – The Penetrator. This isn’t to say that there’s anything wrong with strapping on (I’m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can’t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that to ma&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signal boost: &#8220;The Devaluation of Male Submission&#8221; &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-160878</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal boost: &#8220;The Devaluation of Male Submission&#8221; &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-160878</guid>
		<description>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming – duh duh duh – The Penetrator. This isn’t to say that there’s anything wrong with strapping on (I’m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can’t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that to ma... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming – duh duh duh – The Penetrator. This isn’t to say that there’s anything wrong with strapping on (I’m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can’t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that to ma&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The devaluation of male submission &#124; Delving into Deviance</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-160796</link>
		<dc:creator>The devaluation of male submission &#124; Delving into Deviance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-160796</guid>
		<description>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming &#8211; duh duh duh &#8211; The Penetrator. This isn&#8217;t to say that there&#8217;s anything wrong with strapping on (I&#8217;m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can&#8217;t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that t... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is it that makes dominant women uncomfortable with femdom? There are a lot of things. One of the biggest is the sexist attitude that is rampant in the BDSM community. It often seems like women have to remain ice queens, untarnished by actually having penile-vaginal intercourse with their male subs. However, if they want to they can become more male, and thus, more dominant by strapping on and becoming &#8211; duh duh duh &#8211; The Penetrator. This isn&#8217;t to say that there&#8217;s anything wrong with strapping on (I&#8217;m a fan myself), but a sex act does not a Dominant (or a submissive) make and we can&#8217;t just superimpose the male-female dichotomy onto Dominant-submissive and expect that t&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My unreal experience on the Kink, Inc. Armory Tour &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-146121</link>
		<dc:creator>My unreal experience on the Kink, Inc. Armory Tour &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-146121</guid>
		<description>[...] I questioned my sexual orientation, and then I questioned my gender identity—largely due to my sexually submissive inclinations, no less—intuitively, I knew I was bisexual. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I questioned my sexual orientation, and then I questioned my gender identity—largely due to my sexually submissive inclinations, no less—intuitively, I knew I was bisexual. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-censorship best practices for the sex-positive publisher &#8211; Atlanta Poly Weekend 2011 &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-130977</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-censorship best practices for the sex-positive publisher &#8211; Atlanta Poly Weekend 2011 &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-130977</guid>
		<description>[...] be better for business and the environment. Yet American culture’s obsession with essentialism—on dichotomies, which are, briefly, a set of “good” things that are exclusive from an opposing set of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be better for business and the environment. Yet American culture’s obsession with essentialism—on dichotomies, which are, briefly, a set of “good” things that are exclusive from an opposing set of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March Events and a Segment on Sexploration with Monika &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-118652</link>
		<dc:creator>March Events and a Segment on Sexploration with Monika &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 03:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-118652</guid>
		<description>[...] of Design&#8217;s Queer Student Association. Readers following KinkForAll closely will recognize the kernel of the seminar from last year&#8217;s event in Providence. The RISD seminar will be a long-form discussion of the same material, featuring a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Design&#8217;s Queer Student Association. Readers following KinkForAll closely will recognize the kernel of the seminar from last year&#8217;s event in Providence. The RISD seminar will be a long-form discussion of the same material, featuring a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; Honor thy language: &#8220;kinky&#8221; is an adjective, not an activity</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-64353</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed &#8250; Honor thy language: &#8220;kinky&#8221; is an adjective, not an activity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-64353</guid>
		<description>[...] sand—to draw the speaker&#8217;s preferred line in the sand—reify the hegemonic formulation of sex as dichotomized into obscene or decent acts. Emma goes on to say: We know as well about what Kink shouldn’t be – exclusionary, prejudicing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sand—to draw the speaker&#8217;s preferred line in the sand—reify the hegemonic formulation of sex as dichotomized into obscene or decent acts. Emma goes on to say: We know as well about what Kink shouldn’t be – exclusionary, prejudicing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mizztcasa</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/02/08/on-dichotomies/#comment-49407</link>
		<dc:creator>mizztcasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1297#comment-49407</guid>
		<description>thank you for your small acts!!! love the advice as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your small acts!!! love the advice as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

