<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edenfantasys&#8217;s unethical technology is a self-referential black hole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/</link>
	<description>Because &#039;kinky&#039; is an adjective, not an activity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moronosphere &#187; It&#8217;s epic. It&#8217;s detailed. It&#8217;s devastating. And it&#8217;s hilarious</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-329431</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moronosphere &#187; It&#8217;s epic. It&#8217;s detailed. It&#8217;s devastating. And it&#8217;s hilarious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-329431</guid>
		<description>[...] better is the post that stirred all this, over at MayMay&#8217;s blog, Maybe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] better is the post that stirred all this, over at MayMay&#8217;s blog, Maybe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantis23</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-294999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantis23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-294999</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the response - I was just confused because I didn&#039;t think I should be able to get to your actual blog, and post on it, by following links from EF, if they aren&#039;t really linking to the external site they appear to link to. Maybe it only happens with some of their links...or...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the response &#8211; I was just confused because I didn&#8217;t think I should be able to get to your actual blog, and post on it, by following links from EF, if they aren&#8217;t really linking to the external site they appear to link to. Maybe it only happens with some of their links&#8230;or&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-294249</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-294249</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#comment-294205&quot;&gt;Is it possible EF has stopped doing this self-referential thing (which I admit I don’t fully understand, as a layperson)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-294205&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mantis&lt;/a&gt;, I just took another look right now and EF is &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; doing this sneaky &quot;linklike&quot; redirection. Remember, Mantis, that if you haven&#039;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alanwood.net/demos/enabling-javascript.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;disabled JavaScript in your browser&lt;/a&gt; then it will &lt;em&gt;appear&lt;/em&gt; as though real links are working. They&#039;re not real links, though, as my post details, above.

So if what you want to know is whether EF is still doing unethical things on the Internet, the answer is yes. What you choose to do with that knowledge is up to you. I, for one, have made &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/maymaym/status/164795012398329859&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my position on EdenFantasys clear&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#comment-294205"><p>Is it possible EF has stopped doing this self-referential thing (which I admit I don’t fully understand, as a layperson)?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="#comment-294205" rel="nofollow">Mantis</a>, I just took another look right now and EF is <em>still</em> doing this sneaky &#8220;linklike&#8221; redirection. Remember, Mantis, that if you haven&#8217;t <a href="http://www.alanwood.net/demos/enabling-javascript.html" rel="nofollow">disabled JavaScript in your browser</a> then it will <em>appear</em> as though real links are working. They&#8217;re not real links, though, as my post details, above.</p>
<p>So if what you want to know is whether EF is still doing unethical things on the Internet, the answer is yes. What you choose to do with that knowledge is up to you. I, for one, have made <a href="https://twitter.com/maymaym/status/164795012398329859" rel="nofollow">my position on EdenFantasys clear</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantis23</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-294205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantis23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-294205</guid>
		<description>Hi! I&#039;m a bit confused, because I reached this blog post by following a link from the EdenFantasys website to read a full review on a locking toy box, which (apparently) took me to Toys for Tarts, and then another link to here. Would I have been able to get here, and post a comment, if I weren&#039;t actually on the maybemaimed.com site? Is it possible EF has stopped doing this self-referential thing (which I admit I don&#039;t fully understand, as a layperson)?

Thanks for helping me decide whether to continue purchasing from EF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I&#8217;m a bit confused, because I reached this blog post by following a link from the EdenFantasys website to read a full review on a locking toy box, which (apparently) took me to Toys for Tarts, and then another link to here. Would I have been able to get here, and post a comment, if I weren&#8217;t actually on the maybemaimed.com site? Is it possible EF has stopped doing this self-referential thing (which I admit I don&#8217;t fully understand, as a layperson)?</p>
<p>Thanks for helping me decide whether to continue purchasing from EF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backdoor access to your FetLife profile remained open permanently &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-262304</link>
		<dc:creator>Backdoor access to your FetLife profile remained open permanently &#171; Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-262304</guid>
		<description>[...] If you already knew that you currently have little to no protection when using FetLife and you chose not to do anything differently in light of that—if you already knew the emperor is naked and you chose to pretend that he is clothed anyway—then, great! More power to your polite fiction! However, if you falsely believed you were secure because you were intentionally or accidentally misled, then I say shame on those who mislead you. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you already knew that you currently have little to no protection when using FetLife and you chose not to do anything differently in light of that—if you already knew the emperor is naked and you chose to pretend that he is clothed anyway—then, great! More power to your polite fiction! However, if you falsely believed you were secure because you were intentionally or accidentally misled, then I say shame on those who mislead you. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Miras</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-144855</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Miras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-144855</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this thorough investigative information about EDENFANTASY &#039;s unethical behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this thorough investigative information about EDENFANTASY &#8216;s unethical behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-132678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-132678</guid>
		<description>Haha wow this is amazing, SEX &amp; SEO in one blog? I LOVE it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha wow this is amazing, SEX &#038; SEO in one blog? I LOVE it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-132340</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-132340</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-131437&quot;&gt;So what’s with the nofollow links on these comments? Seems a bit pot and kettle.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/why-you-should-nofollow-your-blog-comments.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it&#039;s not&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-131437&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tony&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-131437"><p>So what’s with the nofollow links on these comments? Seems a bit pot and kettle.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, <a href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/why-you-should-nofollow-your-blog-comments.html" rel="nofollow">it&#8217;s not</a>, <a href="http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-131437" rel="nofollow">Tony</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-132217</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-132217</guid>
		<description>&quot;EdenFantasys’s publishing platform has effectively outsourced the task of “link farming” (a questionable Search Engine Marketing [SEM] technique) to sites with which they have “an ongoing relationship,” such as AlterNet.org, other large news hubs, and individual bloggers’ blogs.&quot;

Google seem to be getting better at filtering and are evolving all the time. To the best of my knowledge, link farms are now practically useless.

Apart from that, it&#039;s hardly a fair trade for you to link directly to their site and they not give a reciprocal link. Saying they have a link on another site going to yours is not reciprocal in the &#039;eyes&#039; of the google bot.

Dave
Webmaster of - &lt;a href=&quot;http://interviewquestionsandanswers.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Interview Questions and Answers&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;EdenFantasys’s publishing platform has effectively outsourced the task of “link farming” (a questionable Search Engine Marketing [SEM] technique) to sites with which they have “an ongoing relationship,” such as AlterNet.org, other large news hubs, and individual bloggers’ blogs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google seem to be getting better at filtering and are evolving all the time. To the best of my knowledge, link farms are now practically useless.</p>
<p>Apart from that, it&#8217;s hardly a fair trade for you to link directly to their site and they not give a reciprocal link. Saying they have a link on another site going to yours is not reciprocal in the &#8216;eyes&#8217; of the google bot.</p>
<p>Dave<br />
Webmaster of &#8211; <a href="http://interviewquestionsandanswers.net" rel="nofollow">Interview Questions and Answers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://maybemaimed.com/2010/05/19/edenfantasyss-unethical-technology-is-a-self-referential-black-hole/#comment-131437</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maybemaimed.com/?p=1745#comment-131437</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s with the nofollow links on these comments? Seems a bit pot and kettle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s with the nofollow links on these comments? Seems a bit pot and kettle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

