As you probably heard, a sexist bigot Iranian Cleric by the name of Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi claimed that women who don’t dress modestly cause earthquakes:
Many women who do not dress modestly […] lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes.
This ridiculous statement caused 22 year old Jennifer McCreight to call on women to Help fight supernatural thinking and the oppression of women, just by dressing immodestly!
She instituted “Boobquake,” a global experiment on Monday, April 26th (tomorrow!) to see if so-called immodest dress actually causes earthquakes.
I think this is a fun meme, and I see nothing inherently wrong with it. Nevertheless, the call to immodesty in the name of science offended way more than just Iranian clerics. Many feminists seem to object to the idea that women’s bodies can be a source of pride and joy and empowerment for the women those bodies are attached to, even when those women clearly demonstrate their own agency. The objections, unsurprisingly, seem to imply that in a patriarchal society, women have no agency.
McCreight’s boobquake event sparked concern from these other feminists, causing them to launch a counter-event called brainquake. Brainquake says:
We (Negar Mottahedeh and Golbarg Bashi) are saddened that Jen McCreight, a blogger at Blag Hag, and a so-called feminist and thousands of women have responded by committing to show off “some cleavage for ‘Boobquake’ this Mondayâ€. This campaign has aroused the evidently insatiable enthusiasm of the web community, male supporters in particular who can’t wait to see “regular†girls and women, many their direct friends to “showing off their titsâ€.
While many people may not understand the full context in which boobquake was originally proposed, is it appropriate for others to view the boobquake event with such tunnel vision? Well, yes and no, actually. Brainquake makes important and necessary arguments:
Everyday women and young girls are forced to “show off cleavage†and more in order simply to be heard, to be seen, or to advance professionally. The web is already filled with images of naked women; the porn industry thrives online and many young girls are already vulnerable to predatory abuse. Violence against women and girls has a direct correlation to the sexualisation of women and girls. The extent of their sexualisation is evident in the hundreds of replies that pour into the “Boobquake†Facebook page where women write, apologetically: “I don’t have boobs, not fair” or “Hey, I only have a C cup… †and “what about those of us who no longer have a cleavage? they sag too low.â€
Indeed, lack of self-esteem, poor body-image, non-consensual sexualization and many other problems, no tragedies, affect billions of women (and many men, I’d like to add) every day. This oppression absolutely must end. But is calling Jennifer McCreight, a woman who is a double major in genetics and evolution, a “so-called feminist” really part of the solution?
Now, look. The way I understand it, feminist ideals are not about shaming women’s bodies, nor pressuring women to expose them. Feminism is about gender equality for every body, male-assigned, female-assigned, intersex, and everyone else! In a world where women are pressured by men to either cover themselves or expose themselves, do we really need other feminists to be pressuring women in the same manner out of the inertia of ideological imperatives?
In the words of nonviolent women’s rights and social justice activist Arundhati Roy, When we are violent to our enemies, we do violence to ourselves. When we brutalize others, we brutalize ourselves. And eventually we run the risk of becoming our oppressors.
Don’t let ideological feminists shame you into covering yourself up, or pressure you into exposing yourself. Your body is YOURS. It is yours to show off however you like, whether physically, intellectually, or otherwise.
That said, the brainquake event, which asks women to show off their intellect instead of their cleavage by honor[ing] the accomplishments of Iranian women by showing off our abilities, our creativity, our ingenuity, and our smarts on our blogs, on Wikipedia, on Twitter, on Youtube, on Flickr and all over Facebook
is a fantastic idea, too!
I think both Boobquake and Brainquake are fantastic ideas. So why the infighting? Why the “you’re not a real feminist” finger-pointing? Why did an Iranian cleric, whose ideology believes that promiscuous women cause earthquakes for fuck’s sake, fracture the unity with which women and men and every freedom-loving person on the planet needs in order to create a world where gender justice becomes a reality?
So I say, yes, let’s absolutely honor the intellectual accomplishments of Iranian women! But let’s also honor the accomplishments of women who do not dress modestly, such as Annie Sprinkle, “prostitute and porn star turned sex educator and artist,” and the numerous other feminists who stand up for the rights of women to be sexy on their own terms.
In response to all this divisiveness I keep seeing in feminist debates over issues of sexuality, I think it’s time for a FEMQUAKE!
Both breasts and brains are good for humanity and deserve our respect. Don’t coerce women into being proud of one over the other, or feeling ashamed of either! YES WE CAN all get along.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states “Everyone on Earth is born free and equal in dignity and rights.”
Part of what that means is that every woman has the prerogative to do as she pleases, from showing off cleavage on Boobquake to showing off intellect on Brainquake.
The core ideal is not a woman’s body or her mind, but her humanity. Decrying women who are proud of their bodies is as oppressive as forcing the ones who aren’t to cover them up. Hailing intellectualism over physical value is as insensitively demonizing as nonconsensual sexualization.
It’s time for women, men, and everyone else to empower one another to live the lives we want to live, free of coercion and abuse, whether modestly dressed or not.
It’s time for a FEMQUAKE!
Regardless of your gender, please join Femquake on April 26th, by blogging, tweeting, and publicizing the achievements of women, whether physical, intellectual, or (preferably) both! Tag your blog post with “Femquake” and your tweets with #Femquake to participate.
Even though there’s not much time, I’m going to run a post on this blog tomorrow highlighting the achievements of a woman who I know stands up for women’s sexuality, dresses immodestly, and has numerous academic and professional achievements.
Because smart is sexy, and sexy is smart, too.
by Kristina Lloyd
26 Apr 2010 at 00:57
Nice work!
I love my body and my sexuality and I do great cleavage every day. My objections to boobquake don’t stem from shame, body-hate, puritanism or prudishness but from a belief that this campaign, launched in isolation (as it was), reinforced those sexist notions that women are associated primarily with, and valued for, their bodies and their sexiness. Brainquake came along to remind us we are more than that.
I really appreciate that you’re trying to beat the binary and harmonise the two aspects here.
by maymay
26 Apr 2010 at 01:11
Thanks, Kristina. One of the things I’ve noticed time and again is that it’s often the things that resonate with people—for whatever reason—that end up “hitting the big time.” Jennifer McCreight is quoted as saying that, had she known the Internet would take Boobquake to a media frenzy, she would have more carefully considered its name and promotional methods.
Hindsight is, as they say, 20/20. I think it’s important to remember this, for if we forget it, we will all too quickly cast stones towards McCreight and assume an intention she does not seem to have.
While doubtlessly similarly well-intentioned, Brainquake is an idea that wants to bring good things to light through sub-optimal means. Why Brainquake’s founders found it necessary to assume bad faith on McCreight’s part, evidenced by their derisive remarks calling her a “so-called feminist,” is not clear, but what is clear to me is that taking offense assumptively is incredibly dangerous.
There is a sort of proverb that old-school programmers will recall: Any sufficiently complex problem needs to be coded three times—and you have to solve the problem each time. In other words, you learn so much from “solving” the problem the first time that you realize how much better you could have done it. This was Jennifer’s realization about the crudeness of Boobquake. Then you take what you learn, scrap what you had, and you do it again in a way that accounts for the problems you found the first time. This was Brainquake.
Of course, it’s still not quite right, because your new approach threw out some of the initial “correct” ideas. And that’s why you need to code it again a third time: that, I believe, is what Femquake is.
Thanks for your acknowledgement of what I’m trying to do here. :)
Pingback
by Of boobquakes and holy icons « Cubik’s Rube
26 Apr 2010 at 13:25
[…] to get into the debate about the scientific rigour or feminist implications of this right now, but Maymay has some good ideas. I think trying to get together a whole new movement on the same day was possibly a tactical […]
by The Beautiful Kind
26 Apr 2010 at 20:25
I’m all about shaking it up, but I didn’t jump on the boobquake bandwagon. And not just because I don’t have boobs. I dunno – I post pics of me in lingerie and even nude, but when I’m living my life and doing my thing I dress conservatively, which throws people off. They assume I’m a slut bomb.
When I see a woman dressed “sleazy” or “slutty,” I perceive her as insecure, like she needs to put it out there to validate her sexuality. Hm, I suppose I’m validating my sexuality through my online persona, so I need to find balance in other places. I love contrast. So maybe the women dressing slutty for this special day are doing what a lot of women do on Halloween – finding an excuse to be a sex bomb, which is what I’m doing every day.
It would be wild if America had a Burka Day where every woman dressed in frumpy long sleeve, long skirt outfits from head to toe. WITHHOLD our sexuality, dial it back. I think that would be more powerful. We show off legs and cleavage all the time, what would it be like for men to lust after a glimpse of ankle again? Whoa.
by maymay
26 Apr 2010 at 20:30
What would it be like for women to have the culturally-approved freedoms to be the lusters, for once?
I can understand a desire to return to old fashioned times, but I do not have that desire myself. Why do so many people long for yesteryear, which under no measure of scientific evidence can be considered an improvement to the living standards we have available today, instead of forging towards a future even better than the one full of the problems we have today?
Pingback
by In The Wake Of The Boobquake
26 Apr 2010 at 21:16
[…] Here’s another great post about the feminist response to Boobquake. I love this quote: Don’t let ideological feminists shame you into covering yourself up, or pressure you into exposing yourself. Your body is YOURS. It is yours to show off however you like, whether physically, intellectually, or otherwise. Posted in Raunch Culture, Sex and Women | […]
Pingback
by Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed › Femquake Fallout: Feminism, the Internet and Boobquake (and Brainquake)
27 Apr 2010 at 15:39
[…] appealing. That’s when I decided I’d break the binary and came up with Femquake. As I wrote when I introduced the idea: Both breasts and brains are good for humanity and deserve our respect. Don’t coerce women into […]
Pingback
by Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed › Yes, men can be feminist leaders.
05 May 2010 at 10:01
[…] without fear of humiliation. And apparently, I learned painfully for the first time through this Femquake thing, some feminists believe I’m also not allowed to offer leadership in gender justice activism […]