Predator Alert Tools exist for other sites, too, including for Facebook and for Twitter! Read more about this Internet-wide anti-rape initiative!
The Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid (PAT-OKC) is an add-on to your Web browser that alerts of you of any red flags for a given profile as you browse OkCupid. A “red flag” is simply a public action taken by the given profile that is concerning, such as answering Match Questions in the same way an undetected rapist is statistically likely to answer them. For instance, given the following question, an answer of “Yes.” would be alarming:
Have you ever been in a situation where you tried, but for various reasons did not succeed, in having sexual intercourse with an adult by using or threatening to use physical force (twisting their arm, holding them down, etc.) if they did not cooperate?
This is not a hypothetical question, nor is the answer universally obvious. This is, in fact, the exact phrasing of a question used in a study called “Repeat Rape and Multiple Offending Among Undetected Rapists” by David Lisak and Paul M. Miller, published in Violence and Victims, Vol 17, No. 1, 2002 (Lisak and Miller 2002).
Tragically, a statistically significant portion of respondents answered in the affirmative. This finding was essentially duplicated in a similar study called “Reports of Rape Reperpetration by Newly Enlisted Male Navy Personnel” by Stephanie K. McWhorter, et. al., published in Violence and Victims, Volume 24, No. 2, 2009 (McWhorter 2009). While much smaller than the portion of respondents who answered with a “no,” the fact that some people blithely answered “yes” makes these questions worth asking up-front, to everyone, all the time.
The Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid automates this process and issues warnings if its heuristics find a concerning match. This early warning system can help OkCupid users make better informed choices about what measures they feel they need to take to remain safe while using the service.
Additionally:
- While browsing OkCupid, the Predator Alert Tool will visually highlight any user profile you encounter that has answered these questions in a concerning way. Click through to the user’s profile for a complete listing of concerning Match Question answers.
- Each time you load a user’s OkCupid profile, that user’s profile picture is scanned against the United States’s Sex Offender Registry using the facial recognition service provided by CreepShield.com, and the an “RSO facial match” percentage is shown to you.
Click on the RSO facial match percentage to a get more information in an OkCupid pop-up.
Click the “Search” button in the pop up to get the full search results from CreepShield.com.
System requirements
The following software must be installed on your system before installing the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid user script.
Mozilla Firefox
If you use the Mozilla Firefox web browser (version 12.0 or higher), ensure you have the Greasemonkey extension installed (at version 1.0 or higher).
Google Chrome
If you use the Google Chrome web browser (version 23 or higher), ensure you have the Tampermonkey extension installed.
Installing
To install the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid, go to http://maybemaimed.com/playground/predator-alert-tool-for-okcupid/ and click “Download and install” near the middle of the page:
There’s also a fantastic, thorough installation walkthrough (with screenshots!) you can follow.
If you enjoy this script, please consider tossing a few metaphorical coins in my cyberbusking hat. :) Your donations are sincerely appreciated! Can’t afford to part with any coin? It’s cool. Tweet your appreciation, instead.
If maybemaimed.com is censored where you are, you can alternatively go to the Userscripts.org page for Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid and click on “Install“. If the tool is also unavailable there, you can alternatively download PAT-OKC from GitHub.com.
Using
After installing the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid (PAT-OKC), you will be presented with a welcome screen that describes the tool’s use, its limitations, and provides links to helpful safety information.
Click on the “Go” button and you’ll begin the installation questionnaire, modeled after the survey in Lisak and Miller’s study, cited above. It’ll look like this:
Complete the Match Questions in the PAT-OKC questionnaire just as you would an ordinary OkCupid question. When you submit your answer, you’ll automatically be redirected to the next required question. You’ll also be able to pause the questionnaire periodically and resume it later.
When you’ve completed all of the questions, you’ll be presented with a pop-up box that offers a brief summary of how to use the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid:
If you encounter a profile on an OkCupid page whose behavior on the site is concerning, PAT-OKC will highlight links to that user’s profile in a red, blocky outline. Viewing that user’s OkCupid profile page will offer a full explanation of why that user’s profile was red-flagged.
Frequently Asked Questions
Before you report a new issue with the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid (PAT-OKC), please check to ensure your question is not already addressed in the list below.
- Can I suggest additional criteria as a “red flag”?
- Why are profiles I’ve never visited showing up on my “You recently visited” list?
- Where can I learn more about this issue?
Can I suggest additional criteria as a “red flag”?
Yes. If you come across an OkCupid Match Question that you think PAT-OKC should consider as a “red flag,” click the “Suggest as ‘red flag’ to PAT-OKC” button, described above. You can also suggest Match Questions for consideration without having PAT-OKC installed by filling in the suggestion form manually. (The “Suggest” button simply pre-fills the suggestion form with as much data as it can find automatically.)
If you would like to suggest new Match Questions, first create the Match Question on OkCupid, and then suggest it for consideration to PAT-OKC.
Version 0.4 of PAT-OKC also includes a “custom flag” feature. You can tell Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid to treat any question you encounter as a red flag by clicking the “Add to my red-flags” button next to the “Suggest as ‘red flag'” button. The “Add to your custom set of red-flag warning questions” pop-up will appear, and you can indicate which answer(s) concerns you. Then click “Save.” You can edit your custom flag at any time by clicking the “Edit this red-flag” button, which replaces the “Add to my red-flags” button.
Why are profiles I’ve never visited showing up on my “You recently visited” list?
Part of the way PAT-OKC works is by “looking” at the public answers to Match Questions other users provided on their profiles. To do this, PAT-OKC needs to load those profiles. It does exactly what you do when you look at other people’s answers; it loads their pages!
Since PAT-OKC loads their profile, OkCupid thinks you’ve “visited” their profile. This is normal and, unfortunately, unavoidable for as long as OkCupid doesn’t provide an officially supported way to do what PAT-OKC does. (Feel free to contact them and let them know you want them to change this!)
In the mean time, however, this means other users may be getting notified that you’ve “visited” their profile. OkCupid does provide an option for you to browse anonymously. This means that even if you visit someone’s profile, you won’t show up in their “visitors” list, even though they will still show up in your “You recently visited” list.
You can learn more about “browsing openly” on OkCupid’s privacy help page.
Where can I learn more about this issue?
The following articles are important reads that offer additional background and context for this issue:
- No good excuse for not building sexual assault prevention tools into every social network on the Internet
- Tracking rape culture’s social license to operate online
- Help dating websites’ Rape Culture FAADE Away
- Rape culture, meet Internet culture: PAT-OKC and other online anti-rape initiatives
Each of the pages listed above also contain numerous additional links. I’d recommend reading them, too.
Change log
- Version 0.5.3:
- Questionnaire: To help protect users against abusive sadomasochists, BDSM’ers, and sexual dominants, Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid now includes questions about rolequeerness in its default set of red-flags.
- Stability: Auto-update switched to GitHub from now defunct Userscripts.org.
- Bugfix: Fix bug in auto-update detection routine that failed to notice patchlevel updates.
- Version 0.5.2:
- Enhancement: Only open new tabs for CreepShield.com when required by the specific error message.
- Version 0.5.1:
- Bugfix: CreepShield integration now works with Google Chrome as well as Mozilla Firefox.
- Bugfix: RSO facial match pop-up can be viewed more than once without reloading the profile page.
- Bugfix:
.webp
profile pictures returned by OkCupid are now translated to.jpg
, which CreepShield expects, resulting in fewer “CreepShield Error” responses and more successful searches.
- Version 0.5:
- Integration with CreepShield.com now offers automatic facial recognition scans of OkCupid user profile pictures against the United States national Sex Offender Registry.
- Version 0.4.3:
- Update for OkCupid’s new internal JavaScript, fixes bug causing failure to display “OkCupid Predator Alert Warning” profile section.
- Version 0.4.2:
- Update for OkCupid’s new interface includes:
- Fixes for visual interlacing, incorrect questionnaire sequence, more.
- Notify users of Predator Alert Tool for Facebook availability.
- Update for OkCupid’s new interface includes:
- Version 0.4.1:
- Fix bug where custom flag popup was sometimes visually obscured.
- Version 0.4:
- New feature: custom flag set. You can now define your own set of warning questions and red-flagged answers.
- Fixed bug where some possible answers to Match Questions were not being suggested in the PAT-OKC suggestion form.
- Version 0.3:
- Add survey questions from McWhorter’s 2009 study to flag questions set.
- Fix bug where pausing the questionnaire before answering the first question resulted in unpredictable behavior.
- Add simple version check mechanism.
- Version 0.2.4:
- Issue #3: Improve performance. This may resolve some reported crashes, particulary on Firefox, too. (Thanks, focalintent!)
- Fixed bug #1: PAT-OKC now remembers your place in the questionnaire, even if you forget to “pause.”
- Fixed broken links in some pop-up messages.
- Version 0.2.3:
- Fixed typo in user interface. :) What? I’m human, too.
- Version 0.2.2:
- Improve local data handling so as not to rely only on a centralized server.
- Version 0.2.1:
- First public release.
- Version 0.2:
- Initial orientation path and installation quesionnaire.
- Version 0.1:
- Initial working prototype.
by quartzpebble
25 Mar 2013 at 22:02
I like this idea! Will it notify a user if they themselves are flagged?
by maymay
26 Mar 2013 at 11:33
Not currently, quartzpebble. Would you have changed that?
by sam
29 Mar 2013 at 09:52
I wouldn’t make that change.
If rapists are aware that their behavior is being flagged, it makes it far too simple to change the answers to questions, thus lulling users of the tool into a false sense of security. Like the FL tool, it’d be easy enough for people to find out if they wanted to whether or not their flagged – no reason to make it that much easier to deceive.
Were I still using OKC, I’d use this in a heartbeat. After being raped by someone I met using online dating tools, I can’t advocate for this enough. (OTOH, I met my life partner on OKC, too, so I don’t hold the tool responsible, I hold the rapist asshole responsible. But that’s a discussion for another time.)
by quartzpebble
29 Mar 2013 at 13:46
My thought was that someone who is interested enough to install this tool is either less likely to be a predator or self-aware enough to lie anyway. I’m thinking of someone I with whom I have a high match score (including on the questions I personally screen creepiness with, such as the “NO means NO” one) who a friend warned me off from. He uses, hm, expected language around consent and boundaries but apparently doesn’t act accordingly and I’m pretty sure he would pass through this. I see Sam’s point, though, and I think I agree.
I’d like more transparency on the flagging criteria, regardless. There are questions that I would personally say a “yes” to is fine if there was consent but with no consent are a giant red flag (I’m thinking about the repeated punching one in particular).
by maymay
29 Mar 2013 at 13:57
If you take a look at the source code for the PAT-OKC client, quartzpebble, you’ll see there are already some notes regarding features that make it possible for users to define their own sets of red flags. Is this what you mean by “more transparency on the flagging criteria”?
While not yet available, my hope is to offer such a capability in future versions so users like you can create lists much like the way an ad blocker works, and distribute these lists to fellow users.
Naturally, I could use help (in the form of code contributions or monetary donations) to make that possible.
by Theo
29 Mar 2013 at 15:07
I did not realize OK Cupid had this as an issue. I am on OK Cupid and it disturbs me that anyone would be sexually assaulted after meeting someone on this dating site. The app is a good first step but I really think the company itself should make a concerted effort to bar sexual predators from using the dating site at all. But it’s probably never gonna happen. Quite a terrible situation that has no easy answers. I just think we need a major change in how people think about sex in this country, we have two extremes-sexual repression and sexual exploitation and to a certain extent we are missing sexual awareness. I have always felt that more honesty and access to accurate information and education about sex will help to solve some of the problems.
by quill
29 Mar 2013 at 19:02
Tampermonkey crashes approximately every third OKC page, uninstalling Tampermonkey and PAT-OKC, which forced me to review my answers to the mandatory questions like three times.
by maymay
29 Mar 2013 at 19:09
Hi Quill, I’m sorry you’re having trouble using PAT-OKC. Please see How to Write a Good Bug Report and follow the steps described there to report the problems you’re having with PAT-OKC. Thanks for trying it out, though.
by quartzpebble
29 Mar 2013 at 23:45
I took a look at the source code but I’m not very familiar with JS so I am fuzzy on the details. I do like the idea of allowing users to define their own red flags (it would certainly simplify some of my use of the site).
I’m not clear how the “flag a question” feature is working right now. It looks to me like it sends it back to the server but I’m not clear on how the specific problematic answers are identified. Am I anywhere in the right ballpark on this?
by maymay
30 Mar 2013 at 00:01
:) Yes. The “Suggest as ‘red flag’ to PAT-OKC” button is just a link to a Google Form at the moment.
Pingback
by Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid flags profiles of people who have confessed to rape « Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed
01 Apr 2013 at 10:47
[…] http://maybemaimed.com/playground/predator-alert-tool-for-okcupid/ […]
by Adam
01 Apr 2013 at 11:15
What’s the threshold for “dangerous?” One question? Two? Five? I’m especially asking because two of the questions do not concern consent or non-consent, namely the “choking” and “hitting/slapping” questions. If they both said “without that person’s consent” that’d be alarming, but on their own they could help me find kink-friendly partners. (Or, I admit, semi-confessed abusers, but those are grey questions.)
by maymay
01 Apr 2013 at 11:51
The threshold for “dangerous” is whatever makes you feel unsafe, Adam. PAT-OKC makes no effort to perform a personalized risk evaluation, it merely highlights potentially troublesome answers to specific questions and displays those concerns front-and-center to the user. Here’s what it might like if you used the tool.
If I understand your reference correctly, both of the questions you name in your comment were copied verbatim from the cited study by Lisak and Miller.
For what it’s worth, since the BDSM Scene has self-reported rates of consent-violating behavior in excess of 50% that of the remainder of the population, there does not seem to me to be a compelling reason to specifically exclude those questions.
Or, stated less diplomatically, I have no qualms flagging self-reported top-like behavior because the BDSM Scene is an abusive social institution whose main self-preservation imperative is actively designed to violate the consent and well-being of submissive-identified people. And that’s wrong.
by Adam
01 Apr 2013 at 12:05
Yup, I’m familiar with your work, thanks. I wasn’t suggesting the questions be excluded, just asking what the threshold was. I guess I was wondering where they came from, too, and you’ve answered that.
It wasn’t clear to me from quickly trying the extension or scanning this post what the final effect was. I saw that profiles would be marked in red, but, I apologize, I missed the sentence “Viewing that user’s OkCupid profile page will offer a full explanation of why that user’s profile was red-flagged.”
Thanks for the screenshot and explanation. Including that in the post as well would help skimmers like me, but I recognize that’s not your responsibility.
Pingback
by How to Install the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid | Emotional Mutation
03 Apr 2013 at 22:20
[…] and Multiple Offending Among Undetected Rapists†by David Lisak and Paul M. Miller, which you can read more about on the PAT-OKC developer’s blog. Others are standard Match Questions that have been in the OkCupid database for a long time. You […]
by buttsack
04 Apr 2013 at 04:32
Will this work for an incognito window in Google Chrome?
by maymay
04 Apr 2013 at 05:04
You’ll need to allow Tampermonkey to run in an incognito window, but once you do that, yes, it will.
by Heather
04 Apr 2013 at 12:36
The install page stays stuck, but shows up as installed, and then never gives me the page to fill out the questions, and disappears when I reboot.
by maymay
04 Apr 2013 at 12:43
Hi Heather, I’m sorry you’re having trouble using PAT-OKC. Please see How to Write a Good Bug Report and follow the steps described there to report the problems you’re having with PAT-OKC. Thanks for trying it out, though.
Pingback
by OkCupid is a company; “they don’t give a fuck about you.” « Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed
04 Apr 2013 at 23:40
[…] OkCupid does not throw in creeper filter questions. Users like you do. […]
by Jade
14 Apr 2013 at 11:58
this is great maymay! i like to use opera, has anyone had any luck getting it to work via the violentmonkey extension. theoretically it should work the same as firefox and chrome right? it doesnt seem to work for me though.
by maymay
14 Apr 2013 at 17:22
Jade, Opera support for the Predator Alert Tool for OkCupid would be great, but no one’s implemented it so far. However, the obvious solution here is to petition OkCupid to implement this feature themselves, on their servers, thereby obsoleting the need for a browser extension like this in the first place.
This is not an unreasonable request of OkCupid, as they already have the technology required to do this. They have simply chosen not to offer it to their end users. Such behavior is shameful.
Pingback
by Why the “Choking Question†is a Litmus Test for Domism | That's Not a Kink Blog; THIS is a Kink Blog!
15 Apr 2013 at 02:12
[…] flags users whose public answers to those questions might be cause for concern. Although the tool could be modified to use any number of “red flag” criteria, the current iteration uses a default set of questions from David Lisak and Paul M. Miller’s […]
by Naamah
06 May 2013 at 20:48
This is an awesome thing you have done, and I am very, very grateful.
I answered several of those questions in a problematic way. I’m flagged, now. And I’m totally comfortable with that. I WANT PEOPLE TO FEEL SAFE, BE INFORMED, and hopefully actually BE SAFER. I added explanations to clarify that these were all consensual, happy events, or (for the hitting) it was self-defense in a threatening situation and it only happened once. Anyone who visits will be able to see my answers right away, and understand the context.
I mean, Jesus Christ. If I’m not comfortable helping potential partners make informed decisions about whether or not to trust me based on answers to admittedly scary questions, what the hell would that say about me? About my trustworthiness as a top? Nothing good.
People are saying that predators are clever enough to get around this. Yes, they ARE. But many DON’T make the effort. Like, more than you would think. Browsing OKC, I’ve seen shocking answers to questions that you’d think that nobody who ever wanted to have a relationship ever again would answer the way that they did. But they DID admit these things. They came right out and said it. And those answers can be buried in a shit-ton of other questions, and therefore hard to find. This tool dredges at least some of them up. This is a good thing, it’s an effective thing. I’m already seeing how useful it is, as it’s alerted me to three problematic people already, and based on their answers, I won’t have contact with them.
It doesn’t have to catch EVERY potential predator. It’s working if it catches even ONE.
Thank you for doing this. Thank you very, very much. It may not be perfect, according to some folks, but it’s a damn sight better than what I had yesterday, which was bupkis. I appreciate it, and I hope that it helps keep people safe.
Pingback
by Pissed off, couldn’t resist… | Kink in exile
07 May 2013 at 14:35
[…] you feel the PAT-OKC chocking question is unfair because what you did is consensual, you […]
Pingback
by Got Consent? Part III: FetLife Doesn’t Get It | Disrupting Dinner Parties
08 May 2013 at 07:31
[…] [Note: A tool with a similar purpose, though very different mechanism, has now been developed for OK Cupid (Predator Alert Tool for OK Cupid (PAT-OKC)).] […]
Pingback
by Suppose you were a total fucking wanker, and suppose you were a member of the BDSM community who objected to predator awareness; but I repeat myself. | Tales of a Domme
11 May 2013 at 00:00
[…] Maymay, KIE, and Stabbity, all three of whom actually have a history in the meat world bdsm community, have posted recently about a PAT-OKC tool Maymay created to let people using the OKCupid site about possible predators. […]
by vanilla
14 May 2013 at 08:12
i’ve been trying to install this on both chrome and firefox, i have tampermonkey and greasemonkey, but the code for PAT-OKC doesn’t seem to actually exist. is this a fake app?
by maymay
14 May 2013 at 09:53
No, vanilla, this is not a fake app. I am also having problems installing the script from the Userscripts.org sources, however, and I’ve emailed the maintainer of that website to ask them if there is a problem. Thanks for informing me about this issue.
In the meantime, you can install the app by installing it using the download PAT-OKC from GitHub link, instead. (Make sure you have Tampermonkey or Greasemonkey installed before you click the link in the previous sentence, though.)
by Burdy
16 May 2013 at 11:10
Been lead through a series of links to this page whilst trying to find a way to send feedback about this script – hope I’m not in the wrong place?
Just today, it appears the script has updated? Or something. Every time I open okc it urges me to answer more questions – mostly ones I’ve already answered.
Anyway, wanted to point out I (a cisgender female) am being asked to answer the question “Have you made a female have sexual intercourse (putting all or part of your penis in her vagina even if you didn’t ejaculate or come) by using some degree of force or threatening to harm her?”
As I do not actually, you know, own a penis, this question is irrelevant but I am unable to skip it?
I also have a big issue with the questions concerning consensual BDSM (choking, slapping, etc) but at least there I can offer a comment about my answer, so I can live with that.
Thanks anyway, great script otherwise – very useful (And wow a lot of guys think no doesn’t always mean no!)
– Burdy
by maymay
16 May 2013 at 11:53
You’re in one of many right places for feedback, Burdy.
Yes. See the PAT-OKC change log, above, for a list of things that have changed. In this case, new questions were added.
Have you considered that answering “No.” to this question is both accurate and important?
I have a big issue with you having a big issue about this, and so I’ll direct you to these very important posts on this matter:
Further discussion about these questions will be deleted from this comment thread.
Thanks. And yes, the “wow” moment you’re describing was the point of this script. See also: Repeat Rape: How do they get away with it? Part 1 and Part 2.
Pingback
by : Why the “Choking Question” is a Litmus Test for Domism | tumblr backups
19 May 2013 at 14:40
[…] The recently released Predator Alert Took for OkCupid is an add-on for OkCupid that highlights Match Questions related to sexual consent and/or violence and flags users whose public answers to those questions might be cause for concern. Although the tool could be… […]
by Jane
03 Oct 2013 at 18:06
MayMay, are you single? Inquiring minds beg to know.
by J
03 Oct 2013 at 18:17
Here’s my wow moment: I’m a lesbian, and a LOT of the gay women in my area are flagged, including some I’ve contacted.
Though, I’ve also been guilty of one of the items: throwing an object in anger (though not at my partner, but still, very bad)- now that I realize that throwing objects is abusive/indicative of other abusive behaviors, I’ll never do it again!
I hope that this isn’t used by rapists to figure out that they’re flagged and outsmart the system. Then again, as other people have pointed out, many just don’t care or don’t consider their answers “rape.”
Thank you, thank you for this app. Wonderful idea, beautiful execution.
by maymay
04 Oct 2013 at 12:16
Jane, “single” isn’t a meaningful term to me. You’re welcome to peruse my OkCupid profile, if you like. :)
by Jessica
28 Oct 2013 at 18:48
How do I fully uninstall PAT-OKC? I like the idea, but once I installed everything, it visited so many profiles that I couldn’t actually use OkCupid anymore.
by maymay
28 Oct 2013 at 20:33
Jessica, you uninstall PAT-OKC the same way you would uninstall any other userscript.
by Julia
06 Mar 2014 at 11:18
How does this add-on being installed help anything at all? The person installing it is answering the questions, not the countless other people on the site. Maybe I’m misunderstanding something but it seems like it would only work if all the predators of OK Cupid had to install this and truthfully answer the questions.
by maymay
06 Mar 2014 at 12:15
Julia, you do misunderstand, or at least you are not really thinking about the long term. Please see:
TL;DR: Rape culture means people boast about, rather than feel remorseful about, and are given social rewards, for being rapists. This tool makes that harder. Forcing serial rapists to lie about being serial rapists to be considered datable is better than the status quo. Duh.
If you wanted to read more, you could also read various other posts about the tools:
by Julia
07 Mar 2014 at 09:09
Now you’re misunderstanding me. I didn’t say, “This won’t prevent rape”. If the questions are contained in the add-on, and a small minority of the site users have installed this, then how do you make every other user on the site answer the questions?
by Julia
07 Mar 2014 at 09:16
It’s like if a person says, “I’m worried about people driving drunk. So I installed this thing in my car that won’t let me drive if I’m drunk.” It doesn’t achieve its purpose unless you can make all, or most of people who have a tendency to drink and drive install one in THEIR car.
by maymay
07 Mar 2014 at 14:32
Wow, Julia. You show your ignorance proudly. Your analogy is hopelessly flawed. It’s more like, “I’m worried about getting hit by a drunk driver, so I installed an alarm system that beeps loudly when it detects that another car near mine is behaving like its driver is drunk.”
I do not have the time or patience to deal with your ignorance. Future comments of yours will be deleted.
by Dana
21 Mar 2014 at 16:28
Thank you so much for creating this. I’m not on OKC at the moment, but this thing here actually makes me curious to try it again. :)
Pingback
by WHOA: 4 Questions That Got 120 Rapists To Admit... » The Viral Trend... Funny, Viral Videos, Pictures and Stories
22 Mar 2014 at 03:02
[…] a post this upsetting without some links to tools to help make things better, here is a link to the OK Cupid Predator Alert Tool, which is a browser extension for Chrome that adds a red flag to the profile of any person who has […]
by Kaid
23 Mar 2014 at 08:07
I don’t know if the script is broken, but pretty much every profile with more than a handful of match questions ends up flagged. I suppose it’s possible everyone in my area is an abusive sexual predator, but that seems to defy rationality.
Looking at previous comments, “J” on 03 October 2013 mentions a similar problem, though I am looking at straight/bisexual women rather than gay.
by maymay
23 Mar 2014 at 10:55
Kaid, “defy rationality” is an interesting choice of words considering this topic. If you click through to the flagged profile the script will tell you up-front exactly why that profile was flagged. If you find a profile that’s flagged for literally no reason, as in no explanation is given, then that’s definitely a bug in the software and I’d appreciate it if you would report such issues to our bug tracking tool.
But if you’re simply dismayed at how many people are flagged, then you’ve betrayed profound naiveté and the thing that is “broken” is not the software, but, well, I’ll just say “something else.”
by Brie B.
23 Mar 2014 at 22:22
I just wanted to let you know I just downloaded the PAT-OKC tool, and I’ve been having some problems with it. First, it wouldn’t let me answer all the questions required for it to work, and then it flagged people who shouldn’t have been flagged; in fact, I combed through one flagged gentleman’s answers and the only questions about predatory behavior and/or mindset that he had answered were, “No means no…” to which his response was, “Always, absolutely”, and “are there any circumstances under which someone is obligated to have sex with you?” to which he said no.
I’m using Chrome version 33.0.1750.154 with Tampermonkey version 3.6.3737.80
Pingback
by WHOA: 4 Questions That Got 120 Rapists To Admit They Were Rapists | Really Upbeat
24 Mar 2014 at 04:38
[…] a post this upsetting without some links to tools to help make things better, here is a link to the OK Cupid Predator Alert Tool, which is a browser extension for Chrome that adds a red flag to the profile of any person who has […]
Pingback
by WHOA: 4 Questions That Got 120 Rapists To Admit They Were Rapists | Worth a Giggle
24 Mar 2014 at 05:15
[…] a post this upsetting without some links to tools to help make things better, here is a link to the OK Cupid Predator Alert Tool, which is a browser extension for Chrome that adds a red flag to the profile of any person who has […]
Pingback
by WHOA: 4 Questions That Got 120 Rapists To Admit They Were Rapists | Very Good Work
24 Mar 2014 at 05:33
[…] a post this upsetting without some links to tools to help make things better, here is a link to the OK Cupid Predator Alert Tool, which is a browser extension for Chrome that adds a red flag to the profile of any person who has […]
by maymay
24 Mar 2014 at 16:44
@Brie:
Thanks for notifying me of this. I’ve fixed this in an updated version. Try uninstalling and re-installing PAT-OKC to get the latest version.
I haven’t been able to replicate this issue. I need more information to figure out why that may have happened. Can you please send me a link to the profile where this happened.
There’s also a really good article about writing bug reports in ways that help resolve issues called “How to write a good bug report.” If you haven’t read it, consider doing so, as they also link to a wonderfully detailed template you can copy-and-paste into the PAT-OKC bug report form.
Thanks.
by Brie B.
24 Mar 2014 at 17:07
Okay, I sent you an email at your bitetheapple email address with the profile in question.
by maymay
25 Mar 2014 at 15:05
Thanks, Brie. As I mentioned in my response to your email, I could not replicate the issue you’re describing. The profile you linked me to does not show itself to be flagged for any unexpected reason and therefore I cannot consider it a bug.
Pingback
by Companies are using fear to market lifestyle accessories to womenThe Warri Post | The Warri Post
31 May 2014 at 17:30
[…] bars, caterers, and celebration hosts — not usually particular women — buy them in bulk. The Predator Alert Tool for OKCupid and other sites records red flags on user profiles, sloping off by their answers to […]
by Ella
12 Aug 2014 at 08:58
Can anyone PLEASE tell me how I can get this installed? I’ve never used scripts before. I downloaded the Tampermonkey extension for Chrome, but every website I go to that supposedly has this OKCupid script just goes to an “unavailable” page when I click on the download link. Is there another way to get this file?
by maymay
12 Aug 2014 at 09:25
Hi Ella,
A lot of the pages that used to host this script have been taken down for one reason or another (sometimes malicious, sometimes censorship, sometimes simply because the service stopped existing). One place that still hosts the script is the code repository itself.
So, thankfully, once you have installed Tampermonkey, you can still go here:
https://github.com/meitar/pat-okcupid/raw/master/okcupid-predator-alert-tool.user.js
Unfortunately, you won’t get automatic updates (because of the above-mentioned take downs of this script). But you can still return to this URL on occasion to see if there is an update available, yourself.
There’s also a more detailed walkthrough of the installation process at this site. The URL they point to has also been taken down, but I left a comment pointing to the other URL that still works.
Good luck.
Pingback
by The first nine people I thought of when I saw #couragehasmanyfaces | nickfarr.org
22 Sep 2014 at 11:52
[…] plying his skills for six/seven figures, but he quit all that on principle to work on things like stopping rapists and helping you shield yourself from prying […]
by January
14 Apr 2016 at 07:14
Is this tool still supported? I installed today, and it appears in my list of installed tools on the Tampermonkey dashboard, but does not run on OkCupid. Any help you can offer would be appreciated!
by maymay
14 Apr 2016 at 23:10
No. See here for why. TL;DR: OkCupid updated their UI and so this needs to be updated accordingly. However, I don’t want to do it because it’s a thankless job and I’m pretty fucking sick and tired of doing anti-abuse work with zero community support. If you want to send me a patch to fix this I’ll happily test and deploy it, tho.